Showing posts with label Chronic Care Management. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Chronic Care Management. Show all posts

Monday, March 30, 2009

Chronic Care: Wagner's Chronic Care Model

Over 100 million people in the US are suffering from at least one chronic illness. "Three-quarters of the $2 trillion-plus that we spend on U.S. health care each year goes to paying the bills for chronic illness: cardiovascular and pulmonary disease, cancers, diabetes, arthritis, high blood pressure, depression."

The Chronic Care Model focuses on practice improvement for patient-centered evidence-based proactive care of chronically ill populations.

Science and Society's February 2009 edition features an audio interview with Ed Wagner, the father of the Chronic Care Model. The interview reviews the implications of the chronic care model for "redesigning the health care delivery system, creating a better-prepared practice team, and developing methods for increasing patients’ knowledge, skills, and confidence." Improving Chronic Illness Care provides a video overview of the Chronic Care Model by Dr. Wagner.

1500 medical practices are using the Chronic Care Model. The Chronic Care Model "comprises six interrelated system changes: effective team care; planned interactions; self-management support; community resources; integrated decision support; and patient registries and other supportive information technology (IT)."

From a technology perspective, registries, decision support, patient/provider communication, patient education and information exchange for care coordination are all important enablers. "Registries track patients with specific chronic diseases, helping medical teams to make the most of each office visit and follow evidence-based care guidelines."

The chronic care model is designed to address the deficiencies in current practice of chronic care including:
  • "Rushed practitioners not following established practice guidelines
  • Lack of care coordination
  • Lack of active follow-up to ensure the best outcomes
  • Patients inadequately trained to manage their illness"
Health Affairs January/February edition was dedicated to The Crisis in Chronic Disease. Susan Dentzer finds that "the evidence continues to pile up that the famed Chronic CareModel developed by Ed Wagner and colleagues at Group Health Puget Sound delivers superior patient care and health outcomes. (The evidence is starting to trickle in about the model’s overall cost-effectiveness.)"

In a recent interview, Dr. Ben Littenberg summarized that "the Chronic Care Model is a very influential idea about how to do a good job in taking care of people with ongoing medical problems like high blood pressure, arthritis, and in our case, diabetes. It tells what resources the health care system must have to get the most out of the interaction between the doctor and the patient. These include systems to support clinical decision making, up-to-date and easy-to-use clinical information, reminders, support for patient self-management, and so on. Turning a typical primary care medical office into a fully-functional chronic care model practice is a good thing, but it is complex, expensive and time-consuming. It requires extensive retraining of the physicians, nurses and other staff, installation of comprehensive electronic medical records systems, changes in the way patients and staff interact, and even an overhaul of the way care is paid for. So, very few practices have successfully transformed themselves."

Roberts Wood Johnson had contracted with Rand to evaluate the impact of the Chronic Care model. "Highlights of the findings include:
  • Organizations were able to improve, making an average of 48 changes in 5.8 out of the 6 CCM areas;
  • Patients with diabetes had significant decreases to their risk of cardiovascular disease;
  • CHF pilot patients more knowledgeable and more often on recommended therapy, had 35% fewer hospital days;
  • Asthma and diabetes pilot patients were more likely to receive appropriate therapy.
When contacted a year later, the care teams reported that involvement in the collaboratives was rewarding. Over that year, 82% of sites had sustained the changes and 79% of sites had spread change to other places or diseases."

Dr. Wagner is focusing his current efforts on regional models for chronic care.


The Chronic Care Model was developed in part with support from Robert Woods Johnson grant by Improving Chronic Illness Care with direction and technical assistance from the The MacColl Institute for Healthcare Innovation at the Group Health Center for Health Studies.

Thursday, March 19, 2009

The Week in Review - March 19, 2009

A look back at some of the best news stories (and some entertaining diversions) from the week in health care.
________________

Is it that "Obama's EHR push (is) not so easy to execute"? Or is it a "bad bet on medical records"? Or is it an "$80 billion exaggeration"?

On the other hand, perhaps it's the "staging (of) a revolution".
________________

It's the right thing to do, but will fee-for-service providers think so?: Technology to "skip the doctor's office".

Employers are intensifying efforts around managing chronic health conditions.

Bargaining down self-pay bills.

Does the bad economy cause patients to A) put off surgery, b) rush to surgery, or c) all of the above?

Massachusetts eHealth Collaborative forms a for-profit subsidiary to advise nationally on EHR implementations, health information exchange and quality reporting with board members including John Glaser and John Halamka.

Health Affairs dedicates an entire issue to stimulating health IT.

And more on the stim package: "Broad federal initiatives for biomedical and comparative effectiveness research, the adoption of health information technology, and the protection of the privacy and security of medical records, the stimulus law should have major and immediate effects."

Northshore UniversityHealth System and Kaiser Permanente hospitals achieve HIMSS Analytics Stage 7 advanced implementation level for the patient record.

Large DNA study of the underpinnings of Parkinson's disease announced by 23andMe.

P4P process and technology adoption "have not translated into breakthrough quality improvements."

And lastly on health care reform, David Kibbe and Brian Klepper describe the "intensifying collapse of the health care system."